¶1 The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.
3 So. 3d 453
Shazer v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 11, 2009
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-03-11
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2009
1 state decisions
Relies on Ingram v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-03-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →