Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 So. 3d 697 - State v. Johnson

3 So. 3d 697 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · Pacheco-Medina v. Oregon · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even though expert testimony is relevant to the issue of whether a defendant is insane, the ultimate issue is for the jury to decide, and it may decide that the defendant is sane despite expert opinion that he is not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.