Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 So. 3d 754 - Lawrence v. State

3 So. 3d 754 - Lawrence v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc. · 759 So. 2d 368 - Humphrey v. State · 784 So. 2d 186 - Austin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Jury instructions are to be read together and taken as a whole with no one instruction taken out of context. A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions which present his theory of the case; however, this entitlement is limited in that the court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Jury Instruction D-12 The Court instructs the jury that the term “heat of passion” is defined as a state of violent and uncontrollable rage engendered by a blow or certain other provocation given and will reduce a homicide from the grade of murder to that of manslaughter. The term includes an emotional state of mind characterized by anger, rage, hatred, furious resentment or terror. Therefore, if you find from the evidence and testimony in this case that Desmond Keys acted in the heat of passion, and while in a state of heat of passion caused the death of Mariyanna Tucker, by shooting her with an automatic weapon, then you shall find the defendant guilty of manslaughter. Jury Instruction D-ll The Court instructs the Jury that the killing of a human being by the culpable negligence of another, without authority of law, is manslaughter, and the Court further instructs the jury that culpable negligence is defined as negligence of a degree so gross as to be tantamount to a wanton disregard of, or utter indifference to, the safety of human life. If you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the death of Mariyanna Tucker was caused by the culpable negligence of the defendant, Desmond Keys, then you shall find the defendant guilty of the crime of manslaughter. Jury Instruction D-10 The Court instructs the jury that if you find from the evidence in this case that the defendant Desmond Keys, is not guilty of the crime of Murder, then you may proceed with your deliber”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.