Riley v. Pate’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive · 856 So. 2d 766 - Neal v. Neal · 344 So. 2d 761 - Zeigler v. Baker · 904 So. 2d 1253 - Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for Children · 986 So. 2d 1093 - Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘When a party without standing purports to commence an action, the trial court acquires no subject-matter jurisdiction.’ State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive, 740 So.2d 1025, 1028 (Ala.1999).... “ ‘[S]tanding turns on whether the party has suffered an actual injury and whether the injury is to a legally protected right.’ Carey v. Howard, 950 So.2d 1131, 1135 (Ala.2006).... [A]n ‘actual or imminent, particularized, concrete, and palpable injury ... is required for a showing of standing.’ Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for Children, 904 So.2d 1253, 1261 (Ala.2004) (See, J., concurring specially).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.