Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 So. 3d 986 - Taylor v. State

3 So. 3d 986 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The evidence must be newly-discovered; that is, it was neither known by the defendant or counsel at the time of the trial, nor could it have been discovered in the exercise of due diligence; and 2. The evidence must be of such a quality and nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he summary denial of a newly discovered evidence claim will be upheld if the motion is legally insufficient or its allegations are conclusively refuted by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.