State v. Cone’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Grim · State v. Dulany · State v. Chaney · State v. Feltrop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is a difference, subtle though it may be, between the psychiatric evaluations of the statements made to [an expert witness] and stating an opinion about the credibility of the witness[].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Marko“is necessary to establish a firm factual basis for the proffered opinion and, therefore, a critical part of the experts”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Marko“latter violates a firmly entrenched rule of evidence prohibiting comment on the [witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Marko
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.