Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 TC 231 - Frankel v. Commissioner

Frankel v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
September 1945
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Butterworth · Burnet v. Whitehouse · Union Trust Co. v. Commissioner · Block v. Commissioner · Rathborne v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The provision for augmenting the payments of net income was contingent upon the combined annual net income payable from the trust and the income from her own property being less than $20,000 — a contingency which has never arisen. It was also contingent upon request being made by her that her income be so augmented. As we view it. the provision did not affect the gift of net income to petitioner nor change her status from an income beneficiary to that of a legatee. ,At most it was a contingent grant of an uncertain sum having none of the attributes of an annuity payable at all events.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * in such installments and at such times as my said wife may request, provided, however, and it is my will that in any event my wife shall have and enjoy during each year of her natural life, a net income which together with the net annual income of her own property, shall be not less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) per annum and should the net income in any one year to which my said wife may be entitled to receive from my Trust Estate, when added to the net annual income of her own property, be less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). then the net income for that year shall be augmented, if my wife shall so request, by adding thereto from the principal of any said Trust Estate such amount or amounts as may be necessary to produce the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), which shall be paid to my beloved wife as above provided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.