3 Tenn. Crim. App. 550 - Layman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1972
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Newsom v. Henderson · Howard v. State · 1 Tenn. Crim. App. 83 - Layman v. State · State ex rel. Folds v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* -x- * * * -X- He [the applicant] now says that he was not present at the time of sentence. He and his two brothers testified that he was present when his new trial motion was overruled but that the judge deferred sentence at that time. The minutes show that the trial judge overruled the motion and sentenced the defendant to 99 years in the penitentiary. * * * His claim that he was not allowed to speak or show cause why sentence should not be pronounced raises no constitutional question. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Layman v. Tollett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.