¶1We think the court erred in finding and in holding that the account was not within the provisions of Art. 3205, Div. 3, Rev. Statutes, and that it vva; barred by limitations. For this error the judgment must be reversed, arid the court proceeding to render such judgment here as should have been rendered below, adjudges that the appellants recover of the appellee the sum of 81250 with interest from May 17, 1878, and ail costs of this court and of the court below, to be enforced by execution as in other cases.
3 Tex. L. R. 524
Gregory, Cooley & Co. v. Beauchamp
Decided January 15, 1885
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1885-01-15
The court below held that the account sued on in this case was barred by the statute of limitations of two years. Held: that a person dealing in live stock, buying and selling them on commission, was a merchant within the meaning of the statute of limitations.
Decided 1885-01-15