Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 U.S. 306 - Arcambel v. Wiseman

Arcambel v. Wiseman’s Empirical Analysis

3 U.S. 306 · 1796

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper (1980), Hutto v. Finney (1979)

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 10 states

190179618001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “general practice of the United States is in opposition to it; and even if that practice were not strictly correct in principle, it is entitled to the respect of the court, till it is changed, or modified, by statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.