Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 U.S. 369 - Emory v. Grenough

Emory v. Grenough’s Empirical Analysis

3 U.S. 369 · 1797

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2007

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

401797180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'By the courtesy of nations, whatever laws are carried into execution, within the limits of any government, are considered as having the same effect every where, so far as they do not occasion a prejudice to the rights of the other governments, or their citizens. * * * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘By the courtesy of nations, whatever laws are carried into execution, within the limits of any government, are considered as having the same effect every where, so far as they do not occasion a prejudice to the rights of the other governments, or their citizens. [Njothing would be more convenient in the promiscuous intercourse and practice of mankind, than that what was valid by the laws of one place, should be rendered of no effect elsewhere, by a diversity of law....”’ Ibid. (quoting 2 U. Huber, Praelectiones Juris Romani ethodiemi, bk. 1, tit. 3, pp. 26-31 (C. Thomas, L. Menke, & G. Gebauer eds. 1725)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.