¶1The Court is of opinion, that the judgment of the District Court is erroneous, in affirming that of the County Court, against the appellant, as executor of the said Edwin Young, without directing the damages and costs to be levied of the goods and chattels of the said Edwin Young, in the hands of the appellant, to be administered, if so much thereof he had; but, if not, then of his own goods and chattels, according to law; therefore, it is considered, that the said judgmentof the District Court be reversed and annulled: And, on the motion of the appellee, who suggested that the transcript of the record of the proceedings in the County Court, transmitted to the District Court, in this cause, is not correct; and it appearing, by a separate copy of the judgment in the County Court, certified by the Clerk thereof, that there is a material variance between that, and the judgment aforesaid, the cause is remitted to the District Court, for that Court to obtain by certiorari, or otherwise, a true and correct transcript of the judgment of the said County Court, and for further proceedings to be had therein.
3 Va. 230
Williams v. Strickler
Decided April 17, 1802
Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 1802-04-17
In this case, suit was brought against Williams, as executor of Young, upon a promise made by the said Young in his life-time, and a verdict being rendered for the plaintiff, in the Countj' Court, judgment was entered for him against the defendant, de bonis testatoris, (as appeared by a copy of the judgment, obtained by the appellee’s counsel, from the County Court, since the cause was brought into the Court of Appeals;) but the Clerk, in making out the record sent up to the…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1989
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1802-04-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →