Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Va. 275

Foreman v. Newkirk

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 1813

Supreme Court of Virginia · decided 1813-01-11

FROM the bill, answers, and exhibits in this case, it appeared that Foreman (the plaintiff in equity) purchased of Andrezv Bowman three tracts of land adjoining each other, comprehended in several patents ; one for 100 acres, another for 129 acres, and a third for 16 acres ; also a sawmill, with á lot of land, whereon it stood, containing more than two acres; the whole including 248 acres, more or less, for the sum of 1,8/5/s, Pennsylvania currency, payable partly in…

Decided 1813-01-11

¶1the following opinion of this Court was delivered by

Judge Roane.

¶2“ The Court, concurring with the Chancellor in opinion, that it appears from the exhibits in the cause, that, independently of the sum enjoined in this case, there is a *277sufficiency of money in the hands of the appellant to indemnify him, agreeably to the tenor of his contract, against any loss he may sustain in the land, in the proceedings mentioned, is of opinion, that there is no error in the said decree ; therefore, it is decreed and ordered shat the same be affirmed.”

/3/va/275 · .json · Public domain