Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Va. 285

Davis v. Martin

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1813

Supreme Court of Virginia · decided 1813-03-16

7'TIIS appeal was from a judgment of the district Court )f Charlottesville, according to a verdict, in favour of , r ri . _ , John… Held: as aforesaid, by and under the said Craig, were not sufficient, in law, to work an actual disseisin of the true owner of lands, in spite of such true owner ¡ and that, therefore, if it should appear to the jury, on further testimony, that the said fames Gardner was, at the time of executing the said will, the true owner of the said…

Decided 1813-03-16

¶1the president delivered the opinion of this Court, “ that the testator, fames Gardner, in the case agreed mentioned, having died prior to the commencement of the act of assembly concerning wills, the distribution of intestates’ estates, and the duty of executors and administrators, and not being seised of the premises in question, at the date of his will, or at the time of his death, there is no error in the opinion of the district Court in the first member of the bill of exceptions contained; but that the instruction given to the jury, as contained in the second member thereof, was improper, in this, that the facts agreed in the case amounted to a disseisin of the premises at the said periods respectively ; and that the said judgment is erroneous.”

¶2Judgment reversed, the verdict set aside, and the *288cause sent to the Superior Court of law, directed to fee held in Albemarle County, for a new trial to be had therein, on which the said last-mentioned instruction is not to be given.

/3/va/285 · .json · Public domain