Palmer v. Mill

Decided April 29, 1809

Decided 1809-04-29

¶1On the authority of the case of Hook v. Turnbull,(b) it was held that the writ might be referred to for the purpose of amendment; and the damages laid therein being sufficiently large, judgment was affirmed by the whole Court.

¶2 May. 1808, MS. and see 2 Hen. & Munf. 457, where the same case is referred to by Jrruoii Tuokek, in giving his opinion in the case of Craghill and others v. Page, Gov. &c.