Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Va. App. 668 - Thompson v. Hampton Institute

3 Va. App. 668 - Thompson v. Hampton Institute’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably 8 Va. App. 512 - James v. Capitol Steel Construction Co. (1989), 29 Va. App. 32 - Fairfax County School Board v. Rose (1999)

25 state decisions

200198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Va. App. 213 - K & L TRUCKING, INC. v. Thurber · 7 Pa. Commw. 588 - P. P. G. Industries, Inc. v. Aites · 140 Ga. App. 585 - Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Neal · 166 Ga. App. 669 - Coats & Clark, Inc. v. Thompson · 130 Mich. App. 68 - Steward v. Westran Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen an employee who previously unjustifiably refused selective employment which was procured for him, thereafter, in good faith, advises his employer that he is willing to accept such work or work of like kind, the employer must resume the payments for compensable injuries even though the procured selective employment may no longer be available.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When compensation benefits are terminated pursuant to the provisions of Code § 65.1-63, based upon a claimant's unreasonable refusal to accept selective employment, benefits may be resumed when the claimant ceases his refusal. We make no distinction between a claimant's entitlement to resumption of benefits upon obtaining other selective employment after having refused to accept a prior offer of selective employment, and such an entitlement following a discharge for cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “shall not be entitled to any compensation... during the continuance of such refusal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.