3 Wash. App. 315 - Mayes v. Emery’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Where the findings are so incomplete as to deprive appellant of an opportunity to challenge them and where consideration of the legal questions involves speculation as to the legal theories the trial court pursued, it is necessary to set aside the judgment in its entirety and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter or clarify the findings on material issues as set forth in this opinion. Under CR 52, as construed by several decisions of the Supreme Court, it is necessary for the trial court to make ultimate findings of fact concerning all of the material issues. See Bowman v. Webster, 42 Wn.2d 129 , 253 P.2d 934 (1953). Gnash v. Saari, 44 Wn.2d 312 , 267 P.2d 674 (1954).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 6 Wash. App. 954 - Jacobson v. Lawrence

2. “It is also the rule that when a real estate agent is entrusted with all the negotiations up to the closing of the transaction, there is an implied authority to make representations which will bind the seller. Jenness v. Moses Lake Dev. Co., 39 Wn.2d 151 , 234 P.2d 865 (1951).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Nelson v. Harkness