Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Wash. App. 393 - Howard v. Kunto

3 Wash. App. 393 - Howard v. Kunto’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Roche v. Town of Fairfield (1982), 100 Wash. 2d 853 - Chaplin v. Sanders (1984)

2 district · 24 state decisions

10019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Wash. 2d 847 - El Cerrito, Inc. v. Ryndak · 71 Wash. 2d 60 - Butler v. Anderson · Naher v. Farmer · 29 Wash. 2d 355 - Skoog v. Seymour · 63 Wash. 2d 552 - Mesher v. Connolly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The requirement of privity had its roots in the notion that a succession of trespasses, even though there was no appreciable interval between them, should not, in equity, be allowed to defeat the record title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “judicial recognition of the need for some reasonable connection between successive occupants of real property so as to raise their claim of right above the status of the wrongdoer or the trespasser”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The deed running between the parties purporting to transfer the land possessed traditionally furnishes the privity of estate which connects the possession of the successive occupants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.