Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Wash. App. 579 - State v. Conley

3 Wash. App. 579 - State v. Conley’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1990

9 state decisions

40197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Drew v. United States · 55 Wash. 2d 58 - Chase v. Beard · State v. Tully · State v. Brunn · 41 Wash. 2d 567 - In RE PETTUS v. Cranor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute permits joinder against a single defendant if the offenses . . . are of the same class of crimes or offenses. State v. Brunn, 145 Wash. 435 , 260 P. 990 (1927). Had severance been granted and Conley tried for the firearms violation alone, evidence of his possession of the tires and the circumstances surrounding his acquisition would have been relevant and admissible in establishing the inference he was also in possession of the pistol. State v. Slaney, 68 Wn.2d 93 , 411 P.2d 426 (1966). If evidence of one crime is admissible to prove an element of a second, joinder of the two crimes cannot be said to be unlawfully prejudicial, where the criteria of this statute is otherwise met. Drew v. United States, 331 F.2d 85, 88 (D.C. Cir. 1964).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.