Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 WASHAPP 615 - State v. Slater

State v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Peasley · 71 Wash. 2d 147 - State v. Redden · 75 Wash. 2d 689 - State v. Dugger · 43 Wash. 2d 807 - State v. Barry · 46 Wash. 2d 594 - State v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each of the words used in this statute upon which a criminal charge can be predicated signifies some form of overt act; the doing or saying of something that either directly or indirectly contributes to the criminal act; some form of demonstration that expresses affirmative action, and not mere approval or acquiescence, which is all that is implied in assent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.