Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Wend. 305

Linacre v. Lush

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1829

New York Supreme Court · decided 1829-10-15

<p>to a defendant ¿°¿g °o triaTat a circuit court n™ice^he canafterwards fendlnt with the plaintiff’s costs of that circuit, though he subsequently obtains a verdict.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1846

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1829-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Taxation of costs. The plaintiff having paid costs to the defendant for not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice at a circuit, antecedent to that at which the cause was treid and a verdict found for the plaintiff; in making up his bill of costs charged the defendant with the plaintiff’s costs of the first circuit. This was objected to by the defendant, and the question submitted to the court, who said that the plaintiff was not entitled to such costs.

¶2J. McKown, for plaintiff.

¶3S. S. Lush, for defendant.

/3/wend/305 · .json · Public domain