Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 WYO 478 - In re Wright

In re Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2008

7 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

60189119001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Ex parte Siebold · Kring v. State of Missouri · Medley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ft is not uncommon practice to change the number of grand jurors required to investigate criminal charges, but we have never heard the right of the legislature to make such changes questioned, neither has it ever been claimed that the charge must be investigated by the precise number of grand jurors of which that body was composed at the time the act was committed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.