Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 A.D.2d 342

Masciarelli v. Powell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1968-07-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1972

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-07-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Capozzoli, J.

¶1(dissenting in part). There is sufficient in the record as to the completion of the railing, and as to the use of those railings by the carpenters, with the knowledge of the defendant, to necessitate a new trial in order to determine whether the accident, in which plaintiff was injured, was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. Therefore, while I agree with the majority that the verdict was excessive, and properly set aside, I disagree with its dismissal of the complaint and I vote for a new trial.

¶2Botein, P. J., Eager and Rabin, JJ., concur with McNally, J.; Capozzoli, J., dissents in part in opinion.

¶3Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondent.

/30/ad2d/342 · .json · Public domain