30 Ala. App. 91 - Connelly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably 42 Ala. App. 314 - Douglas v. State (1963), Edwards v. State (1966)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. State · Smith v. State · 21 Ala. App. 140 - Lancaster v. State · 21 Ala. App. 140 - Nunnley v. State · Sexton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * statements of * * coconspirator made after the termination of the conspiracy are not admissible, unless so clearly related to the commission of the offense as to be a part of the res gestae or unless made in the presence of the defendant and undenied by him, in which latter case they become admissible under the rule of tacit admissions. * * * »”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The declarations of an alleged co-conspirator, made during progress of conspiracy and in furtherance of its object, are admissible as evidence against all the participants, there being introduced sufficient evidence to show prima facie a case of conspiracy or community of purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is sufficient if there is a meeting of the minds or a tacit agreement, its existence being generally a matter of inference from the acts of the participants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.