Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Ariz. 129 - Pugh v. Sullivan

Pugh v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
January 1971
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1971

11 state decisions

40192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodhart v. State · Otis v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty. · Crites v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * if the proceeding is summary, without any written charge, that the record must somewhere show the facts upon which the conviction is based, in order that it can be known that the court had. jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.