Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Backes 310 - In Re Fisler

In Re Fisler’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably In Re the Estate of Coe (1964), 140 N.J. Super. 35 - In Re Estate of Griswold (1976)

26 state decisions

701942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re the Offering for the Probate of a Certain Paper-Writing Alleged to be the Last Will & Testament of Book · Security Trust Co. v. Lovett · Stout v. Cook · Woodcock · 79 N.J. Eq. 573 - Stout v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The paramount rule for the construction of testamentary instruments is that the court must strive to ascertain the intention of the testator as expressed by the words of the instrument. Such intention, if so ascertainable, will prevail over technical rules and will disregard the common, ordinary meanings of words and adopt such meaning as can be deduced from the testator's intention. This has long been the settled rule in England and America and needs no citation of authorities for its support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is no conflict between Ahlemeyer v. Miller and Haver v. Herder. One treats of presumptions that guide in the search for testamentary intention; the other, of the presumed concurrence by the testator in the legislative intent where he expresses no other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he word ‘issue’ signifies, prima facie, ‘heirs of the body’; and the statute ordains that an adopted child shall not be capable of taking property expressly limited to the heirs of the body of the adopting parent or parents----”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.