Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Cal. 3d 470 - People v. Williams

30 Cal. 3d 470 - People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

211
cited by 211 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 197 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 211 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 13 Cal. 4th 497 - People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996), 52 Cal. 3d 336 - Raven v. Deukmejian (1990)

7 federal appellate · 197 state decisions

13301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Woodson v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 211 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judge or magistrate may, either of its own motion or upon the application of the prosecuting attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action to be dismissed. The reasons of the dismissal must be set forth in an order entered upon the minutes. No dismissal shall be made for any cause which would be ground of demurrer to the accusatory pleading.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[m]andatory, arbitrary or rigid sentencing procedures invariably lead to unjust results. Society receives maximum protection when the penalty, treatment or disposition of the offender is tailored to the individual case. Only the trial judge has knowledge, ability and tools at hand to properly individualize the treatment of the offender,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Section 1385 permits dismissals in the interest of justice in any situation where the Legislature has not clearly evidenced a contrary intent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.