Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 CALAPP3D 282 - People v. Wheeler

People v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2002

12 state decisions

601973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Continental Baking Co. v. Katz · 66 Cal. 2d 782 - Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc. · In Re Lane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a finding of fact is attacked on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, the power of an appellate court begins and ends with the determination as to whether there is any substantial evidence [italics added], contradicted or uncontradicted, which will support the finding of fact.... When two or more inferences can reasonably be deduced from the facts, a reviewing court is without power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.