People v. Parra’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 464 - People v. Ray (1999), Wengert v. State (2001)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Gilbert v. California · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · Railroad Commission v. Maxcy · 47 Cal. 2d 374 - People v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““is privileged to enter and remain on land in the possession of another if it reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent serious harm to the land or chattels of the other party, unless the actor has reason to know that the one for whose benefit he enters is unwilling that he shall take such action.” 30 Cal. App. 3d 729 at 732-33 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Well, the fact that the door was left open and the building could be entered, the reason we have to have responsible person come down is to check to see if anything is missing, to see if a crime is committed and to secure his building and make sure everything was to his satisfaction before leaving.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Myers“not predicated upon abstractions or speculation but upon the observed fact of an unlocked door to a retail establishment after business hours, leading to the logical conclusion that the circumstance was a threat both to the private and public interests involved”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.