Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 CALAPP4TH 591 - People v. Cameron

People v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2016

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 1 Cal. 3d 444 - People v. Hood · People v. Ford · 30 Cal. 3d 290 - People v. Watson · 55 Cal. 2d 88 - People v. Robillard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a killing is unlawful it must constitute either a murder or manslaughter, the defining boundary being malice; if the homicide is unlawful and malice is lacking the offense is manslaughter. If the offense cannot be voluntary manslaughter, because the case law holds that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill, it is manslaughter nonetheless and, a fortiori, must be involuntary manslaughter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This well-entrenched doctrine is analytically unfortunate, for an unlawful killing that results from a voluntary battery using force likely to cause great bodily harm but without malice is more sensibly classified, for purposes of culpability, as voluntary manslaughter, regardless of the absence of intent to kill.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not fit within any of the statutory definitions of criminal homicide,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.