← 30 Conn. App. 463 - Foti v. Richardson

30 Conn. App. 463 - Foti v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

cited by 19 later decisions

states following

June 2004

most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Brown · State v. Blasko · Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners · Battersby v. Battersby · To the Honorable Senate of the State of Rhode Island & Providence Plantations

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[C]lassifications based on disabilities are subject to strict judicial scrutiny under the Connecticut constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Bierce v. Comm. of Mental Retardation, No. Cv 93 052 72 80 (Jun. 1, 1994)
“[i]t is the absence of mental retardation that underlies his ineligibility for department services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Bierce v. Comm. of Mental Retardation, No. Cv 93 052 72 80 (Jun. 1, 1994)
“the commissioner has not predicated disparate treatment on the plaintiff's [mental disability].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Bierce v. Comm. of Mental Retardation, No. Cv 93 052 72 80 (Jun. 1, 1994)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.