Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 - Waskiewicz v. Waskiewicz

30 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 - Waskiewicz v. Waskiewicz’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[I]t is the function of trial courts to follow the established law and leave to the Supreme Court . . . of Connecticut or the legislature any sweeping innovations therein if such are desirable from the standpoint of the present era.' Murphy v. Ives , 24 Conn. Sup. 158 , 160 [ 188 A.2d 68 (1963)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.