Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.1d 142 - The Noddleburn

The Noddleburn’s Empirical Analysis

30 F. 142 · 1887

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
January 1944
most recently cited

3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1944

3 district ·

201887189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Belgenland · The Noddleburn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But, although the courts will use a discretion about assuming jurisdiction of controversies between foreigners in cases arising’beyond territorial jurisdiction of the country to which the court belongs, yet where such controversies are communis juris — that is, where they arise under the common law of nations — special grounds should appear to induce the court to deny its aid to a foreign suitor when it has jurisdiction of the ship or party charged. The existence of such jurisdiction in all such cases is beyond dispute; the only question will be whether it will be expedient to exercise it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.