Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.2d 313 - Zaring v. Strauss & Co.

Zaring v. Strauss & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.2d 313 · 1929

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1960
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1960

1 state decisions

1019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ambler v. Choteau · Warren v. . Union Bank of Rochester · Voorhees v. Bonesteel · McConnell v. Langdon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All crops of every nature and description which have been or may be hereafter sown, grown, planted, cultivated or harvested during the year 1925 and 1926, and until said debt is fully paid.” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.