Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.2d 898 - Earl v. Commissioner

Earl v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.2d 898 · 1929

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1940
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Robbins · State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas · In Re Estate of Harris · Kaltschmidt v. Weber · Wren v. Wren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that any property either of us now has or may hereafter acquire ... in any way, either by earnings (including salaries, fees, etc.), or any rights by contract or otherwise, during the existence of our marriage, or which we or either of us may receive by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance, and all the proceeds, issues, and profits of any and all such property shall be treated and considered and hereby is declared to be. received, held, taken, and owned by us as joint tenants, and not otherwise, with the right of survivorship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.