Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.2d 971 - Shapiro v. Lyle

Shapiro v. Lyle’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.2d 971 · 1929

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1969
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1969

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

6019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Beason · Joy v. City of St Louis · Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States · Ma-King Products Co. v. Blair · Corneli v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contention that the National Prohibition Act [ 27 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.] is a deprivation of the free exercise of religion by restricting the delivery of unlimited use of wine, and is contrary to the constitutional guaranty of religious freedom, is, as said by the Supreme Court in Mormon Church v. United States, supra, 136 U.S. 1 , at page 49, 10 S.Ct. 792, 805 , 34 L.Ed. 481 , altogether a sophistical plea: “ 'No doubt the Thugs of India imagined that their belief in the right of assassination was a religious belief; but their thinking so did not make it so. The practice of suttee by the Hindu widows may have sprung from a supposed religious conviction. The offering of human sacrifices by our own ancestors in Britain was no doubt sanctioned by an equally conscientious impulse. But no one, on that account, would hesitate to brand these practices now as crimes against society, and obnoxious to condemnation and punishment by the civil authority.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.