Vahan v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
30 F.3d 102 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the entry of judgment. Accordingly, the district court, had no authority under Rule 4(a)(6) to grant Kell's motion for an extension of time to appeal. 8 Moreover, a district court cannot grant a Rule 4(a)(6) motion unless it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kell v. Hatcher“[t]he district court has no discretion to grant an extension beyond the time provided for by Rule 4(a)(5) and 4(a)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.