United States v. Olvera’s Empirical Analysis
30 F.3d 1195 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2024
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on United States v. Wade · Illinois v. Allen · Estelle v. Williams · United States v. Dionisio · Lane v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court has said that security measures at trial are inherently prejudicial when they 'tend[ ] to brand [the defendant] in [the jurors’] eyes with an unmistakable mark of guilt,' or when they create 'an unacceptable risk ... of impermissible factors coming into play.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Musladin v. Lamarque“a defendant's utterance of a criminal statement may not have an undue influence on the jury where the jury has a clear understanding that the utterance is necessary for the identification of the defendant by a witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.