Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 1220 - Jeldness v. Pearce

Jeldness v. Pearce’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 1220 · 1994

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Flowers v. Southern Regional Physician Services Inc. (2001), Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of Columbia (1996)

21 federal appellate · 5 district ·

3201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D

Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Turner v. Safley · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Hagans v. Lavine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough the programs need not be identical in number or content, women must have reasonable opportunities for similar studies and must have an equal opportunity to participate in programs of comparable quality”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Klinger · Latimore
  2. “could result in administrative problems in many areas”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When a statute lists specific exemptions, other exemptions are not to be judicially implied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.