Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 F.3d 130

Docket No. 94-6588.

Juan Pardo v. Carolyn v. Rickards Captain Kepley Lieutenant Irrizary

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 23, 1994 Decided: August 2, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-08-02

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · McClure v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of America

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-08-02

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-130-2)

Juan Pardo, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pardo v. Rickards, No. CA 94-130-2 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/30/f3d/130 · .json · Public domain