Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 1307 - Orner v. Shalala

Orner v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 1307 · 1994

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Spitznas v. Boone (2006), Carter v. Fenner (1998)

26 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

3101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Reamer v. Beall · Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust · Braley v. Campbell · Van Skiver v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]ees under § 406(b) satisfy a client's obligation to counsel and, therefore, are paid out of the plaintiff's social security benefits, while fees under the EAJA penalize the [Commissioner] for assuming an unjustified legal position and, accordingly, are paid out of agency funds.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] judgment may be void for purposes of Rule 60(b)(4) if entered in a manner inconsistent with due process.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[a] district court would necessarily abuse its discretion if it based its ruling (under Rule 60(b)) on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.