Coggin v. Coggin’s Empirical Analysis
30 F.3d 1443 · 1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Kontrick v. Ryan (2004), Equitable Bank v. Miller (1994)
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 550 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama · Levit Vn v. Ingersoll Rand Financial Corporation · Gifford v. United States · Thomas Southtrust Bank of Alabama Na v. Thomas · Williamson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Time for Filing Complaint Objecting to Discharge; Notice of Time Fixed. In a chapter 7 liquidation case a complaint objecting to the debtor’s discharge under § 727(a) of the Code shall be filed not later than 60 days following the first date set for the meeting of creditors held pursuant to § 341(a). (b) Extension of Time. On motion of any party in interest, after heating on notice, the court may extend for cause the time for filing a complaint objecting to discharge. The motion shall be made before such time has expired.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re McCormack · In Re Miller“[bjroadly speaking, disputes that arise in bankruptcy cases can be divided into the following categories: (1) adversary proceedings, governed by Part VII of the Rules; (2) administrative matters, in which there is no adversary party (for example, an unopposed motion by a trustee to sell property of the estate); and (3) contested matters, which do not qualify as adversary proceedings because they are not included in the Rule 7001 list. Contested matters resemble adversary proceedings in that there are (at least) two parties who are opposing each other with respect to relief sought by one of them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a contested matter in a case under the Code not otherwise governed by these rules, relief shall be requested by motion, and reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing shall be afforded the party against whom relief is sought. No response is required under those rule unless the court orders an answer to a motion. The motion shall he served in the manner provided for service of a summons and complaint by Rule 700k ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.