Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 1501 - Kimbro v. Velten

Kimbro v. Velten’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 1501 · 1994

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno (1995), Osborn v. Haley (2007)

40 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

390199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]pon certification by the Attorney General that the defendant employee was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim arose, any civil action or proceeding commenced upon such claim in a United States district court shall be deemed an action against the United States under the provisions of this title and all references thereto, and the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “logically precede[ ] the question of remand”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it does not matter . . . what the certification actually says — i.e., whether it denies or recharacterizes the plaintiff's allegations of the employee defendant's conduct; its filing simply ensures that a federal court determine whether the employee is entitled to absolute immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.