Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 518 - Randall v. United States

Randall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 518 · 1994

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 19 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Custer v. Sweeney (1996), Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp. (1996)

6 federal appellate · 19 district ·

1070199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1102

Relies on Paul v. Davis · Siegert v. Gilley · Wisconsin v. Constantineau · Chappell v. Wallace · Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) and, at any rate, FIRREA bars injunctive relief; (4) this Court lacks jurisdiction over Counts V and VI because the Federal Credit Union Act requires that such claims be brought within ten days of the commencement of the conservatorship; and (5) Counts IV, VII and IX fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Standard of Review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Because the purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) is to test the legal sufficiency of a complaint, rather than the facts alleged in support of it, we”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hall
  3. “must accept as true all well-pleaded allegations and must construe the factual allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hall

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.