Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 616 - Moore v. McDonald

Moore v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 616 · 1994

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Walker v. Thompson (2002), Jacobsen v. Osborne (1998)

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2901994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Briscoe v. W · Scott v. United States · ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the existence of such facts and circumstances as would excite the belief, in a reasonable mind, acting on the facts within the knowledge of the prosecutor, that the person charged was guilty of the crime for which he was prosecuted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury whichis the basis of the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.