Davidson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
30 F.3d 963 · 1994
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably David Weber/appellant v. Strippit Inc (1999), Turner v. Marshall (1997)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. · Lumpkin v. Lumpkin · Wrenn v. Board of Directors · In re Disbarment of Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] party can establish an otherwise neutral explanation is pretextual by showing that the characteristics of a stricken black panel member are shared by white panel members who were not stricken,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that [a litigant] may not justify peremptory challenges to venire members of one race unless venire members of another race with comparable or similar characteristics are also challenged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.