Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 F.3d 986 - Fields v. Leapley

Fields v. Leapley’s Empirical Analysis

30 F.3d 986 · 1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2018

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Doyle v. Ohio · South Dakota v. Neville · Anderson v. Charles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When analyzing whether Doyle violations are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, this court examines (1) whether the government made repeated Doyle violations, (2) whether any curative effort was made by the trial court, (3) whether the defendant’s exculpatory evidence is transparently frivolous, and (4) whether the other evidence of the defendant’s guilt is otherwise overwhelming.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Such questioning makes no unfair use of silence because a defendant who voluntarily speaks after receiving Miranda warnings has not been induced to remain silent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`I won't talk to you about that without an attorney'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.