Yancey v. Rascoe

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-02-27

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Nathan J. Yancey, Jr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Yancey v. Rascoe, No. CA-01-1498-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.