Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 F. App'x 166

Roberto v. Bell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-03-04

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-03-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing their civil action against several Maryland state court judges. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. Bell, No. CA-00-1438-AW (D.Md. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/30/fappx/166 · .json · Public domain