30 F. App'x 607 - Clay v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Boufford v. Moore · Pagan v. United States · Kapral v. United States · Venters v. City of Delphi · Lowe v. Champion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Bowing to stare decisis, " the court expressed "reluctan[ce] to overrule [its own] recently-reaffirmed precedent without guidance from the Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“invitation to reconsider our holding in Gendron, " although it acknowledged that Gendron 's "construction of section 2255 represents the minority view.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.